Dexmedetomidine for Preventing Sleep Disturbance after Ambulatory Anesthesia: A Case Report.

Propofol anesthesia may impact a patient's sleep quality in the immediate postprocedure timeframe. We describe a 24-year-old man presenting for gastrostomy-jejunostomy tube replacement who reported debilitating sleep-onset disturbances after 3 previous anesthetic exposures for the same procedure. Review of the patient's records revealed the recurring use of propofol infusion. We proposed using dexmedetomidine infusion to potentially avoid another extended sleep disturbance. Following a dexmedetomidine-centered plan, the patient reported experiencing his usual sleep pattern without side-effects for 5 consecutive days postprocedure. This case highlights the potential for propofol-induced sleep disturbance in the ambulatory setting, which may be avoided with dexmedetomidine administration.

Analgesic Mechanism of Dexmedetomidine and Esketamine in Rats with Spinal Cord Injury.

BACKGROUND: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is usually caused by external direct or indirect factors, and with a high morbidity and mortality rate. The aim of this study was to observe the effects of Dexmedetomidine (DEX) combined with Esketamine (ESK) on pain behavior and potential analgesic mechanisms in rats with SCI. The goal was to provide a reliable multimodal analgesic medication regimen for SCI. METHODS: Thirty rats were divided into five groups with six rats in each group: Sham group, SCI group, DEX group, ESK group, and DEX+ESK group. The SCI model in rats was constructed, and the motor function of hind limbs of rats was measured using Basso Beattie Bresnahan (BBB) locomotor rating scale and inclined plate test. The levels of interleukin 18 (IL-18), interleukin 1ß (IL-1ß), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in the spinal cord were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The expressions of substance P (SP), neurokinin-1 receptor (NK-1R), B cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), and Bcl2-associated X protein (Bax) in the rats' spinal cord were measured by Western blot assay. The viability of spinal astrocytes was evaluated by 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. RESULTS: After 7 days, the BBB scores were significantly higher in the DEX, ESK, and DEX+ESK groups compared to the SCI group (p < 0.01). Additionally, the DEX+ESK group had significantly higher scores than both the DEX and ESK groups (p < 0.01). The maximum angle of the DEX (p < 0.05), ESK (p < 0.05), and DEX+ESK groups (p < 0.01) were higher than the SCI group, and the maximum angle of DEX+ESK group was higher than DEX and ESK groups (p < 0.05). The levels of IL-18, IL-1ß, and TNF-α in the DEX, ESK, and DEX+ESK groups were lower than the SCI group (p < 0.01), while the DEX+ESK group had significantly lower IL-18, IL-1ß, and TNF-α levels than the DEX and ESK groups (p < 0.01). The levels of SP (p < 0.01) and NK-1R (p < 0.05) were lower in the DEX, ESK, and DEX+ESK groups compared to the SCI group, and the levels of SP and NK-1R were lower in the DEX+ESK group compared to the DEX and ESK groups (p < 0.01). The DEX and ESK groups suppressed the activity of spinal astrocytes (p < 0.01), however, the DEX+ESK group had larger effects on spinal astrocytes than the ESK group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment using DEX combined with ESK improves the motor function, inhibits inflammation and astrocyte activity, and exerts analgesic effects on rats with SCI. These findings can serve as a reference for the selection of multi-modal analgesics.

Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine plays a pivotal role in mitigating postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction while enhancing the overall quality of life among surgical patients. Nevertheless, the influence of dexmedetomidine on such complications in various anaesthesia techniques remains inadequately explored. As such, in the present study, a meta-analysis was conducted to comprehensively evaluate its effects on postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction. METHODS: A number of databases were searched for randomised controlled trials comparing intravenous dexmedetomidine to other interventions in preventing postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction in non-cardiac and non-neurosurgical patients. These databases included PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Statistical analysis and graphing were performed using Review Manager, STATA, the second version of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised controlled trials, and GRADE profiler. MAIN RESULTS: This meta-analysis comprised a total of 24 randomised controlled trials, including 20 trials assessing postoperative delirium and 6 trials assessing postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Across these 24 studies, a statistically significant positive association was observed between intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine and a reduced incidence of postoperative delirium (RR: 0.55; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.64, p < 0.00001, I2 = 2%) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (RR: 0.60; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.96, p = 0.03, I2 = 60%). Subgroup analysis did not reveal a significant difference in the incidence of postoperative delirium between the general anaesthesia and non-general anaesthesia groups, but a significant difference was observed in the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Nonetheless, when the data were pooled, it was evident that the utilisation of dexmedetomidine was associated with an increased incidence of hypotension (RR: 1.42; 95% CI 1.08 to 1.86, p = 0.01, I2 = 0%) and bradycardia (RR: 1.66; 95% CI 1.23 to 2.26, p = 0.001, I2 = 0%) compared with other interventions. However, there was no significantly higher occurrence of hypertension in the DEX groups (RR = 1.35, 95% CI 0.81-2.24, p = 0.25, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION: Compared with other interventions, intravenous dexmedetomidine infusion during non-cardiac and non-neurosurgical procedures may significantly reduce the risk of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction. The results of subgroup analysis reveal a consistent preventive effect on postoperative delirium in both general and non-general anaesthesia groups. Meanwhile, continuous infusion during general anaesthesia was more effective in reducing the risk of cognitive dysfunction. Despite such findings, hypotension and bradycardia were more frequent in patients who received dexmedetomidine during surgery.

Comparative study between remifentanil (or fentanyl) and dexmedetomidine for the analgesia of rhinoplasty: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Remifentanil (or fentanyl) and dexmedetomidine may have some potential to improve the analgesia of rhinoplasty, and this meta-analysis aims to compare their efficacy for the analgesia of rhinoplasty. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched, and we included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the analgesic effect of remifentanil (or fentanyl) versus dexmedetomidine for rhinoplasty. RESULTS: Four RCTs were finally included in the meta-analysis. In patients undergoing rhinoplasty, remifentanil (or fentanyl) infusion and dexmedetomidine infusion resulted in similar good patient satisfaction (odd ratio [OR] = 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.63 to 11.64; P = .18), good surgeon satisfaction (OR = 1.68; 95% CI = 0.02 to 181.40; P = .83), extubation time (mean difference [MD] = 7.56; 95% CI = -11.00 to 26.12; P = .42), recovery time (MD = -2.25; 95% CI = -23.41 to 18.91; P = .83), additional analgesic requirement (OR = 0.16; 95% CI = 0 to 8.65; P = .37) and adverse events (OR = 8.50; 95% CI = 0.47 to 153.30; P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: Remifentanil (or fentanyl) and dexmedetomidine may have comparable analgesia for patients undergoing rhinoplasty.

NIR-II nanoprobes for investigating the glymphatic system function under anesthesia and stroke injury.

The glymphatic system plays an important role in the transportation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the clearance of metabolite waste in brain. However, current imaging modalities for studying the glymphatic system are limited. Herein, we apply NIR-II nanoprobes with non-invasive and high-contrast advantages to comprehensively explore the function of glymphatic system in mice under anesthesia and cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury conditions. Our results show that the supplement drug dexmedetomidine (Dex) enhances CSF influx in the brain, decreases its outflow to mandibular lymph nodes, and leads to significant differences in CSF accumulation pattern in the spine compared to isoflurane (ISO) alone, while both ISO and Dex do not affect the clearance of tracer-filled CSF into blood circulation. Notably, we confirm the compromised glymphatic function after cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury, leading to impaired glymphatic influx and reduced glymphatic efflux. This technique has great potential to elucidate the underlying mechanisms between the glymphatic system and central nervous system diseases.

Real-time ultrasound-guided sacral plexus block combined with mild sedation for hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoidal artery ligation in a patient with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis present perioperative challenges for clinical anesthesiologists for anesthesia-associated complications. CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old Han woman with a 2-year history of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoidal artery ligation. We performed real-time ultrasound-guided sacral plexus block with dexmedetomidine under standard monitoring. The anesthesia method met the surgical demands and avoided respiratory complications during the procedures. There was no neurological deterioration after the surgery and 3 months after, the patient was discharged. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time ultrasound-guided sacral plexus block combined with mild sedation may be an effective and safe technique in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis undergoing hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoidal artery ligation.

Dexamethasone versus Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants in Ultrasound Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block for Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Mono-Centric Retrospective Comparative Study.

Background and Aim: Ultrasound popliteal sciatic nerve block (UPSNB) is commonly performed in foot and ankle surgery. This study aims to assess the use of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants in UPSNB for hallux valgus (HV) surgery, comparing their efficacy in producing motor and sensory block and controlling postoperative pain. The adverse event rate was also evaluated. Methods: This mono-centric retrospective study included 62 adult patients undergoing HV surgery: 30 patients received lidocaine 2% 200 mg, ropivacaine 0.5% 50 mg and dexamethasone 4 mg (Group 1), whereas 32 patients received lidocaine 2% 200 mg, ropivacaine 0.5% 50 mg, and dexmedetomidine 1 mcg/Kg (Group 2). At first, the visual analogue scale (VAS) was evaluated after 48 hours. The other outcomes were time to motor block regression, evaluation of the first analgesic drug intake, analgesic effect, adverse effects (hemodynamic disorders, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)) and patient satisfaction. The continuous data were analyzed with student's t-test and the continuous one with χ2. Statistical significance was set at a p-value lower than 0.05. Results: No significant difference was found in VAS after 48 hours (4.5 ± 1.6 vs 4.7 ± 1.7, p = 0.621) to motor block regression (18.9 ± 6.0 vs 18.7 ± 6, p = 0.922). The number of patients that took their first analgesic drug in the first 48 h (p = 0.947 at 6 hours; p = 0.421 at 12 hours; p = 0.122 at 24 hours and p = 0.333 at 48 hours) were not significant. A low and similar incidence of intraoperative hemodynamic disorders was recorded in both groups (hypotension p = 0.593; bradycardia p = 0.881). Neither PONV nor other complication was found. Patients in Group 1 reported a lower degree of interference with sleep (p = 0.001), less interference with daily activities (P = 0.002) and with the affective sphere (P = 0.015) along with a more satisfactory postoperative pain management (p < 0.001) as compared to Group 2. Conclusion: No significant differences were observed in the duration of motor and sensory blockade between patients in both groups. Additionally, both groups showed good pain control with a low rate of adverse effects, even if there was no clinical difference between the groups. However, patients who received dexamethasone reported experiencing less interference with their sleep, daily activities and overall emotional well-being, and overall pain control.

Apnea during moderate to deep sedation using continuous infusion of remimazolam compared to propofol and dexmedetomidine: A retrospective observational study.

Remimazolam's rapid onset and offset make it an innovative sedative for use during regional anesthesia. However, its respiratory safety profile is not well understood. We compared the continuous infusion of remimazolam with commonly used sedatives, propofol and dexmedetomidine, after regional anesthesia. In this retrospective study, the incidence of apnea (>10 seconds) was assessed in patients who underwent orthopedic surgery under regional anesthesia and received moderate to deep sedation using continuous infusion of remimazolam (group R: 0.1 mg/kg in 2 minutes followed by 0.5 mg/kg/hr). The incidence was compared with that of propofol (group P: 2-3 µg/mL target-controlled infusion) and dexmedetomidine (group D: 1 µg/kg in 10 minutes followed by 0.4-1 µg/kg/hr). Propensity score weighted multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to determine the effects of the sedative agents on the incidence of apnea. A total of 634 (191, 278, and 165 in group R, P, and D) cases were included in the final analysis. The incidence of apnea was 63.9%, 67.3%, and 48.5% in group R, P, and D, respectively. The adjusted odds ratios for apnea were 2.33 (95% CI, 1.50 to 3.61) and 2.50 (95% CI, 1.63 to 3.85) in group R and P, compared to group D. The incidence of apnea in patients receiving moderate to deep sedation using continuous infusion of remimazolam with dosage suggested in the current study was over 60%. Therefore, careful titration and respiratory monitoring is warranted.

Exploring the impact of dexmedetomidine on short-term outcomes in critically ill sepsis-associated encephalopathy patients.

OBJECTIVE: Dexmedetomidine has demonstrated potential in preclinical medical research as a protective agent against inflammatory injuries and a provider of neuroprotective benefits. However, its effect on the short-term prognosis of patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy remains unclear. This study aims to explore the underlying value of dexmedetomidine in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study enrolled patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database, and they were divided into two groups based on dexmedetomidine therapy during hospitalization. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were utilized to balance the inter-group baseline differences. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves with log-rank test and subgroup analysis were also employed. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality, and the secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) stay time, hospital stay time, and the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). RESULTS: After PSM, 1,075 pairs of patients were matched. In contrast to the non-dexmedetomidine cohort, the dexmedetomidine cohort did not exhibit a shortened ICU [4.65 (3.16, 8.55) vs. 6.14 (3.66, 11.04), p<0.001] and hospital stay duration [10.04 (6.55, 15.93) vs. 12.76 (7.92, 19.95), p<0.001], and there was an elevated incidence of VAP [90 (8.4%) vs. 135 (12.6%), p=0.002]. The log-rank test for the KM curves of dexmedetomidine use and 28-day mortality was statistically significant (p<0.001). The results showed that dexmedetomidine was associated with improved 28-day mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.61, p<0.001] and in-hospital mortality (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.37-0.67, p<0.001) after adjusting for various confounders. In the following subgroup analysis, dexmedetomidine infusion was associated with decreased 28-day mortality in most subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine administration was significantly associated with reduced short-term mortality among patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy in the ICU. However, it also prolonged ICU and hospital stays and increased the incidence of VAP.

Comparison of sedation with dexmedetomidine administered subcutaneously at 2 different locations on the head in dogs.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the sedative effects of dexmedetomidine administered to dogs subcutaneously (SC) at the Governing Vessel 20 (GV20) acupuncture point and at another point on the head. Animals and procedure: Ten client-owned dogs were included. Dogs were sedated 2 times, 14 d apart, with 200 µg/m2 of dexmedetomidine, SC, at GV20 and at a point at the base of the ear (SC-head). The sedation was assessed with a sedation scale and a Dynamic and Interactive Visual Analogue Scale (DIVAS). The ease of performing radiographic studies, physiological parameters, and adverse events were recorded. Statistical linear mixed-effect models (ANOVA) were applied. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: The time to sedation and sedation scores were similar for both groups. The level of sedation achieved was adequate to perform orthopedic radiographs for 9/10 (90%) cases in the GV20 group and 8/10 (80%) cases in the SC-head group. Heart and respiratory rates decreased significantly over time in both groups (P < 0.001). Adverse events were infrequent and self-limiting. Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that SC administration of dexmedetomidine on the head, at the GV20 point or at the base of the ear, is easy and provides a sufficient level of sedation to obtain orthopedic radiographs in dogs.

Comparaison de la sédation avec de la dexmédétomidine administrée par voie sous-cutanée à deux sites différents sur la tête de chiens. Objectif: Cette étude a pour but de comparer les effets sédatifs de la dexmédétomidine administrée par voie sous-cutanée (SC) au point d'acupuncture VG20 et à un autre point sur la tête, non lié à la relaxation/sédation, chez le chien. Animaux et procédure: Dix chiens de clients ont été inclus dans cette étude clinique, prospective, croisée, randomisée et à l'aveugle. Les chiens ont été sédatés deux fois, à 14 jours d'intervalle, avec une injection de 200 µg/m2 de dexmédétomidine sous-cutanée au point d'acupuncture VG20 et à un autre point sur la tête, à la base de l'oreille (SC-tête). La durée et la qualité de la sédation ont été évaluées avec une échelle de sédation et une échelle analogue visuelle dynamique et interactive (DIVAS). La facilité de réaliser des études radiographiques, les paramètres physiologiques et les effets secondaires ont été enregistrés. Des modèles statistiques linéaires à effet mixte (ANOVA) ont été réalisés. Les résultats étaient considérés comme significatifs quand P < 0,05. Résultats: Le temps nécessaire pour atteindre un niveau de sédation adéquat et les scores de sédation étaient comparables entre les deux groupes. Le niveau de sédation était adéquat pour réaliser des radiographies orthopédiques chez 9/10 (90 %) des cas dans le groupe VG20 et 8/10 (80 %) des cas dans le groupe SC-tête. Les fréquences cardiaque et respiratoire diminuaient significativement dans le temps pour les 2 groupes (P < 0,001). Les effets indésirables étaient peu fréquents et auto-limitants. Conclusion: Notre étude suggère que l'administration sous-cutanée de dexmédétomidine sur la tête, que ce soit au point VG20 ou à la base de l'oreille, est facile et permet d'obtenir un niveau de sédation suffisant pour réaliser des radiographies orthopédiques chez des chiens sains.(Traduit par les auteurs).

Dexmedetomidine protects the uterus against ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the histopathological and biochemical effects of dexmedetomidine on the rat uteri exposed to experimental ischemia-reperfusion injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four female rats were randomly divided into three groups. Group 1 was defined as the control group. An experimental uterine ischemia-reperfusion model was created in Group 2. Group 3 was assigned as the treatment group. Similar uterine ischemia-reperfusion models were created for the rats in Group 3, and then, unlike the other groups, 100 µg/kg of dexmedetomidine was administered intraperitoneally immediately after the onset of reperfusion. In blood biochemical analysis, superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activities and malondialdehyde (MDA), interleukin 1beta (IL-1ß), interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) levels were measured. In the histopathological analyses, endometrial epithelial glandular changes (leukocytosis, cell degeneration) and endometrial stromal changes (congestion, edema) were analyzed using the tissue damage scoring system. RESULTS: It was observed that IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α levels were significantly suppressed in Group 3 compared to Group 2 (p=0.001, p<0.001 and p=0.001, respectively). MDA level was noted as the highest in Group 2. The MDA value in Group 3 was measured at 5.37±0.82, which was significantly decreased compared to Group 2 (p<0.001). An increase in antioxidant enzyme activities (SOD and GSH-PX) was observed in Group 3 compared to Group 2 (p=0.001 and p=0.006, respectively). In our histopathological analysis, a significant improvement in endometrial epithelial glandular and endometrial stromal changes was revealed in Group 3 compared to Group 2 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, it has been documented that dexmedetomidine protects the uterine tissue against ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Effect of epidural dexmedetomidine in single-dose combined with ropivacaine for cesarean section.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine has arousal sedation and analgesic effects. We hypothesize that epidural dexmedetomidine in single-dose combined with ropivacaine improves the experience of parturient undergoing cesarean section under epidural anesthesia. This study is to investigate the effect of 0.5 µg/kg epidural dexmedetomidine combined with epidural anesthesia (EA) in parturients undergoing cesarean section. METHODS: A total of 92 parturients were randomly divided into Group R (receiveing epidural ropivacaine alone) Group RD (receiveing epidural ropivacaine with 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine). The primary outcome and second outcome will be intraoperative NRS pain scores and Ramsay Sedation Scale. RESULTS: All 92 parturients were included in the analysis. The NRS were significantly lower in Group RD compared to Group R at all observation timepoint (P > 0.05). Higher Ramsay Sedation Scale was found in Group RD compared to Group R (P < 0.001). No parturient has experienced sedation score of 4 and above. No significant difference regarding the incidence of hypotension, bradycardia and nausea or vomiting, Apgar scores and the overall satisfaction with anesthesia was found between Group R and Group RD (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Epidural dexmedetomidine of 0.5 µg/kg added slightly extra analgesic effect to ropivacaine in EA for cesarean section. The sedation of 0.5 µg/kg epidural dexmedetomidine did not cause mother-baby bonding deficit. Satisfaction with anesthesia wasn't significantly improved by epidural dexmedetomidine of 0.5 µg/kg. No additional side effect allows larger dose of epidural dexmedetomidine attempt. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2000038853).

Dexmedetomidine Prolongs Lidocaine Intravenous Regional Anesthesia in Rats by Blocking the Hyperpolarization-Activated Cation Current.

Purpose: Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) using lidocaine provides effective localized analgesia but its duration is limited. The mechanism by which dexmedetomidine enhances lidocaine IVRA is unclear but may involve modulation of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels. Materials and Methods: Lidocaine IVRA with varying dexmedetomidine concentrations was performed in the tails of Sprague-Dawley rats. Tail-flick and tail-clamping tests assessed IVRA analgesia and anesthesia efficacy and duration. Contributions of α2 adrenergic receptors and HCN channels were evaluated by incorporating an α adrenergic receptor antagonist, the HCN channel inhibitor ZD7288, and the HCN channel agonist forskolin. Furthermore, whole-cell patch clamp electrophysiology quantified the effects of dexmedetomidine on HCN channels mediating hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) in isolated dorsal root ganglion neurons. Results: Dexmedetomidine dose-dependently extended lidocaine IVRA duration and analgesia, unaffected by α2 receptor blockade. The HCN channel inhibitor ZD7288 also prolonged lidocaine IVRA effects, while the HCN channel activator forskolin shortened effects. In dorsal root ganglion neurons, dexmedetomidine concentration-dependently inhibited Ih amplitude and shifted the voltage-dependence of HCN channel activation. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine prolongs lidocaine IVRA duration by directly inhibiting HCN channel activity, independent of α2 adrenergic receptor activation. This HCN channel inhibition represents a novel mechanism underlying the anesthetic and analgesic adjuvant effects of dexmedetomidine in IVRA.

Mechanism of dexmedetomidine protection against cisplatin induced acute kidney injury in rats.

OBJECTIVE: This study explored the molecular mechanisms by which dexmedetomidine (Dex) alleviates cisplatin (CP)-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in rats. METHODS: CP-induced AKI models were established, and Dex was intraperitoneally injected at different concentrations into rats in the model groups. Subsequently, rats were assigned to the control, CP, CP + Dex 10 µg/kg, and CP + Dex 25 µg/kg groups. After weighing the kidneys of the rats, the kidney arterial resistive index was calculated, and CP-induced AKI was evaluated. In addition, four serum biochemical indices were measured: histopathological damage in rat kidneys was detected; levels of inflammatory factors, interleukin (IL)-1ß, IL-18, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha, in kidney tissue homogenate of rats were assessed through enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA); and levels of NLRP-3, caspase-1, cleaved caspase-1, gasdermin D (GSDMD), and GSDMD-N in kidney tissues of rats were determined via western blotting. RESULTS: Dex treatment reduced nephromegaly and serum clinical marker upregulation caused by CP-induced AKI. In addition, hematoxylin and eosin staining revealed that Dex treatment relieved CP-induced kidney tissue injury in AKI rats. ELISA analyses demonstrated that Dex treatment reduced the upregulated levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the kidney tissue of AKI rats induced by CP, thereby alleviating kidney tissue injury. Western blotting indicated that Dex alleviated CP-induced AKI by inhibiting pyroptosis mediated by NLRP-3 and caspase-1. CONCLUSION: Dex protected rats from CP-induced AKI, and the mechanism may be related to NLRP-3/Caspase-1-mediated pyroptosis.

Un mecanismo nefrogénico subyace a la poliuria inducida por dexmedetomidina: informe de un caso / Nephrogenic mechanism underlies dexmedetomidine-induced polyuria: A case report

La dexmedetomidina, agonista del adrenorreceptor α, se utiliza cada vez más como agente sedativo-hipnótico y analgésico, aunque su popularidad suscita preocupación acerca de los efectos secundarios de dicho fármaco.La bradicardia y la hipotensión son efectos adversos comunes, pero también existen diversos informes de gasto urinario excesivo, posiblemente debido a la secreción de vasopresina y a la permeabilidad de los conductos colectores.La poliuria se resuelve normalmente con la discontinuación del fármaco, no habiéndose reportado morbilidad significativa. La identificación temprana, la eliminación del agente y el tratamiento son imperativos para minimizar las complicaciones, principalmente natremia y síntomas neurológicos.Este informe de caso describe la poliuria relacionada con dexmedetomidina durante la anestesia general libre de opioides para cirugía mayor de cabeza y cuello. Nuestra hipótesis de etiología nefrogénica se ve reforzada por los datos analíticos obtenidos. También describimos cómo abordar la poliuria intraoperatoria. (AU)

Dexmedetomidine's α-adrenoreceptor agonism has been gaining popularity in the anesthetic room as a sedative-hypnotic and analgesic agent, and with extensive perioperative use rising concern about side effects is necessary.Bradycardia and hypotension are common but excessive urine output is increasingly reported, suggested mechanisms being vasopressin secretion and increasing permeability of the collecting ducts.Polyuria usually resolves with discontinuation of the drug and significant morbidity has not been reported. Early identification, removal of agent and treatment are imperative to minimize complications, mainly associated with natremia levels and neurological symptoms.This case report describes a dexmedetomidine-related polyuric syndrome during opioid-free general anesthesia for major head and neck surgery. A nephrogenic mechanism for the clinical effect is proposed and reinforced by analytical data obtained. An intra-operative polyuria approach is also delineated. (AU)

The Safety and Efficacy of Remimazolam Compared to Dexmedetomidine for Awake Tracheal Intubation by Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

Background: Remimazolam is a novel ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative that has the potential to be an alternative for procedural sedation due to its rapid sedation and recovery, no accumulation effect, stable hemodynamics, minimal respiratory depression, anterograde amnesia effect, and specific antagonist. Here, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of remimazolam with dexmedetomidine for awake tracheal intubation by flexible bronchoscopy (ATI-FB). Methods: Ninety patients scheduled for ATI-FB were randomly divided into three groups, each consisting of 30 cases: dexmedetomidine 0.6 µg/kg + sufentanil (group DS), remimazolam 0.073 mg/kg + sufentanil (group R1S), or remimazolam 0.093 mg/kg + sufentanil (group R2S). The primary outcome was the success rate of sedation. Secondary outcomes were MOAA/S scores, hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, intubation conditions, intubation time, tracheal intubation amnesia, and adverse events. Results: The success rates of sedation in groups R2S and DS were higher than that in group R1S (93.3%, 86.7%, respectively, vs 58.6%; P = 0.002), and intubation conditions were better than those in group R1S (P < 0.05). Group R2S had shorter intubation times than groups R1S and DS (P = 0.003), and a higher incidence of tracheal intubation amnesia than group DS (P = 0.006). No patient in the three groups developed hypoxemia or hypotension, and there were no significant differences in oligopnea, PetCO2, or bradycardia (P > 0.05). Conclusion: In conclusion, both DS and R2S had higher success rates of sedation, better intubation conditions, and minor respiratory depression, but R2S, with its shorter intubation time, higher incidence of anterograde amnesia, and ability to be antagonized by specific antagonists, may be a good alternative sedation regimen for patients undergoing ATI-FB.